However, this approach affects performance.
Let me explain: the air-fuel mixture on which the engine runs is a proportion of air and fuel. The more fuel, the better the performance but the harder it is to comply with eco regulations. Therefore, the task for engineers is to make the engine run on a lean or ultra-lean mixture while maintaining a certain balance with power.
Sort of a compromise for both sides.
We adjust the air-fuel mixture.
But we don’t pour in maximum fuel; it’s not effective. That would result in smokiness, poorer combustion, and no positive outcome. The goal is to find the ideal balance within the limits (without eco restrictions).
In average driving modes (e.g., cruising steadily on a highway), it’s a different story. A rich mixture is unnecessary and only leads to higher fuel consumption. However, in more performance-oriented situations (e.g., acceleration), we make adjustments because power is needed, not an “eco” mixture. By smoothly transitioning from an ultra-lean mixture to a richer one, we achieve smooth acceleration without increasing fuel consumption (although driving style also plays a role here).
That’s why I always emphasize that we’re not chasing numbers and offer a mild chip tuning. The goal is to find a balance, not achieve an extreme power boost. Priority is given to engine longevity.
For example, the OM642, a popular engine.
Tuning results:
Stock: 184 hp and 400 Nm
Eco Stage1: 230 hp and 490 Nm
+46 hp and +90 Nm
After the tuning, you’ll fall in love with your car all over again: you’ll feel that the engine effortlessly propels the vehicle, with sharper response in all driving modes, without any “eco” sluggishness.
Feel free to reach out to us.
